David's Astronomy Pages
|
Notes (S744) |
Notes Main |
Home Page |
Notes (S746) |
Main aims
Equipment & Software
Highlights
Lowlights
Summary Plots & Logs
Observing Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Observing Result | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dome & Scope Slewing Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Slew/Centering Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sky Conditions (Locate Frames) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Night Sky Summary Plot Top axis: Sky Brightness at Zenith (in ADU/s) Lefthand axis: Local Time (hh LT). Righthand axis: Sun Altitude (degs) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Session Weather Forecast (API data from darksky.net) Forecast showed moderately cloudy skies in first part of night (82-52% cloud cover) before improving after midnight to reach cloud cover levels of 11-19% between 02:00 and 04:00. Windy (18-20 mph increasing later to 23-24 mph). In the event skies were clear between 21:00 and 23:30, but became cloudy after midnight. Wind gusts caused problems during imaging/guiding Observatory automatically closed at 23:40 and apart from a brief attempt to reopen the observatory at 00:28 the observatory remained shut/suspended for the remainder of the night. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Session Event Log | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top
Back to Top
Focusing of TS 80mm GuideScope using SharpCap Multi-Star FWHM Measurement has not given sufficiently satisfactory results. When there is a good star field with a lot of stars the process works ok, but it seems to rely on SharpCap being able to detect more than 10 stars even when stars are out of focus (which must envitably happen during focusing). More often than not SharpCap doesn't find enough stars when starting the focus profile and give null (20.0) FWHM results, and after 6 successive focus steps with null FWHM results AstroMain's Automated Focusing Routine will abort or have insufficient data to determine a best focus position
A new routine has been developed to access SharpCap Single Star FWHM Measurement
results in order to perform autofocusing. (See
SharpCap Notes - Area
Selection for FWHM Measurement )
Prior to the session S00475, the new
routine was tested out on live star fields. The process basically worked
but some of the Focus Profiles produced confusing and contradictory results,
with results depending on the particular star field used and the brightness of
the brightest star. In the end it it was concluded that process
needs to be run on bright stars (mag 2-3) in order to get a good reliable
profile and that human overview is required until . WIth some dimmer
stars the profiles would clear suggest a best focus position (good profile) that
lay some 300 steps outside the expected range, and in distinct contrast to the
visual image indicating bloated / out of focus stars at the supposed position of
best focus. The same star would generate a profile showing
lowest (most out of focus) score at the focuser position corresponding to actual
best focus.
For a while it was thought the SharpCap was actually giving highest score for
best focus, but this was overturned by later profiles on a brighter star and
visual inspection of the full field frames.
With some dimmer field the
focus star would give a profile that was very flat (with no clear peak).
Focus Profile 2. no indication of a FWHM peak at expected position of best focus (9150-9200) |
Focus Profile 4. suggests a FWHM peak (ie 'best focus) towards 9400 or so |
Focus Profile 5 appearing to support a FWHM peak ('best focus')
around 9430 (but notice that point are flat beyond 9430 and don't turn down) |
Focus Profile 8 confirming a very flat profile beyond 9400 (ignore rogue point at 9600 !) |
Focus Profile 9. showing an apparent FWHM high ('best focus') at
around 9500 but this is at a position that was clearly out of focus from visual insepction of full field frames Again note that the 4 right hand points are flat and don't turn down |
Focus Profile 10. showing a FWHM low at around 9100 at a
position that was close to the expected best focus / close to the finally established best focus (at this point it was thought that SharpCap might be calculating focus scores with opposite polarity in some way ! really confusing !) |
Focus Profile 13 (from a dimmer star) shows a slight FWHM low at
least a FWHM flat (ie no peak at around 9050 (in constrast profile 19 from a bright star shows a well forming FWHM profile) |
Focus Profile 18 (from a brighter star) shows a well shaped FWHM
profile with a clear FWHM peak ('best focus') at 9088. Visual inspection of full field frames confirm this position is well focused. |
Focus Profile from S746 (from a moderately bright star) shows a
somewhat ambiguous FWHM profile which is slightly thrown off by one point at ~ 9225 steps. FWHM peak was picked by software routine at 9037 (5.5 degC cooler than 2020-01-25 test session) |
Focus Profile from S747 (from a brighter star) shows a well
shaped FWHM profile with a clear FWHM peak ('best focus') at 8933 (4.8 degC cooler than 2020-01-25 test session) |
Back to Top
Session saw first use of a new chart type that is designed to highlight the
varying quality of guiding performance across different parts of the sky.
During the short (0.9 hour) session all 5 guided targets lay in one
relatively small patch of sky. Consequently the plot was unable to show the
suspected differences between the area west of Meridian (asserted to have worse
guiding) and east of Meridian (asserted to have better guiding).
Target guiding was badly affected by wind gusts.
Best guide
run (no.3) has average RMS of 1.4", compared to 3.4 - 4.1 for guide runs 1,2 &
4.
Guide run no. 5 (RMS 145") failed completely due to cloud
(star lost in 85% of guide frames)
Notes:
- points show the quality of individual guide runs relative to
their sky position
- left-hand plot shows Average RMS for all frames,
right-hand plots show Average RMS for the Worst Frame or FrameSet
Example of Guiding Performance from Session S745 |
Back to Top
This Web Page: | Notes - Session 745 (2020-01-25) |
Last Updated : | 2024-02-21 |
Site Owner : | David Richards |
Home Page : | David's Astronomy Web Site |